<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Stork Theory and Knowledge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anadder.com/the-stork-theory-and-knowledge/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anadder.com/the-stork-theory-and-knowledge</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:39:56 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Richard Dawkins afraid to debate the best? - PriusChat Forums</title>
		<link>http://anadder.com/the-stork-theory-and-knowledge/comment-page-1#comment-78436</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Richard Dawkins afraid to debate the best? - PriusChat Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 14:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anadder.com/the-stork-theory-and-knowledge#comment-78436</guid>
		<description>[...]   Do you think the leaders of ACOG should regularly set up debates against those who believe in the Stork Theory? I mean do you think that&#039;s the best use of both parties&#039; time or shouldn&#039;t they just spend their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]   Do you think the leaders of ACOG should regularly set up debates against those who believe in the Stork Theory? I mean do you think that&#039;s the best use of both parties&#039; time or shouldn&#039;t they just spend their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Optimist</title>
		<link>http://anadder.com/the-stork-theory-and-knowledge/comment-page-1#comment-70714</link>
		<dc:creator>Optimist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 05:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anadder.com/the-stork-theory-and-knowledge#comment-70714</guid>
		<description>Interesting read, thanks for the links, your page comes as up one of the top pages for google search on stork theory :)

Please make a correction regarding blood circulation, it was first discovered by an Arab scientist named Ibn al-Nafis about 400 years before 1650. There are many other polymaths in Islamic world which are not given the due credit (racism and imperialism couldn&#039;t stand if these &quot;lowly&quot; Arabs were 400 years advanced than Europeans, right?). The people like Ibn al-Haitham, Abul Qasim al-Zahrawi, Al-Biruni, Al-Razi, Ibn-e-Sina are a few names that you should google up, they were born during the so-called dark ages of Christian Europe and the polymaths of Christian Renaissance were standing on the shoulders of these giants, these were the people who developed scientific method (as opposed to philosophy). Ibn Al Haitham&#039;s 10th century groundbreaking work of &quot;shukook&quot; (doubts, i.e. of Greek optics) was the first  the early ones were called the groundbreaking work of &quot;shukuk&quot; (doubts, i.e. of Greek optics) was the first treatise on scientific method of empirical evidence as opposed to conjectural theories.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_al-Nafis
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alhazen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting read, thanks for the links, your page comes as up one of the top pages for google search on stork theory <img src='http://anadder.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Please make a correction regarding blood circulation, it was first discovered by an Arab scientist named Ibn al-Nafis about 400 years before 1650. There are many other polymaths in Islamic world which are not given the due credit (racism and imperialism couldn&#8217;t stand if these &#8220;lowly&#8221; Arabs were 400 years advanced than Europeans, right?). The people like Ibn al-Haitham, Abul Qasim al-Zahrawi, Al-Biruni, Al-Razi, Ibn-e-Sina are a few names that you should google up, they were born during the so-called dark ages of Christian Europe and the polymaths of Christian Renaissance were standing on the shoulders of these giants, these were the people who developed scientific method (as opposed to philosophy). Ibn Al Haitham&#8217;s 10th century groundbreaking work of &#8220;shukook&#8221; (doubts, i.e. of Greek optics) was the first  the early ones were called the groundbreaking work of &#8220;shukuk&#8221; (doubts, i.e. of Greek optics) was the first treatise on scientific method of empirical evidence as opposed to conjectural theories.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_al-Nafis" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_al-Nafis</a><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alhazen" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alhazen</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slave to Hypnosis</title>
		<link>http://anadder.com/the-stork-theory-and-knowledge/comment-page-1#comment-62659</link>
		<dc:creator>Slave to Hypnosis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 12:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anadder.com/the-stork-theory-and-knowledge#comment-62659</guid>
		<description>Well the stork theory got its start about the time it was discovered that people were for the birds?  I enjoyed the perspective and had fun reading it thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the stork theory got its start about the time it was discovered that people were for the birds?  I enjoyed the perspective and had fun reading it thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Mange</title>
		<link>http://anadder.com/the-stork-theory-and-knowledge/comment-page-1#comment-55599</link>
		<dc:creator>James Mange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 17:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anadder.com/the-stork-theory-and-knowledge#comment-55599</guid>
		<description>Actually made sense the stork theory works for me. I wonder if they had not discovered blood flow it we would still have high blood pressure?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually made sense the stork theory works for me. I wonder if they had not discovered blood flow it we would still have high blood pressure?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://anadder.com/the-stork-theory-and-knowledge/comment-page-1#comment-2252</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 18:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anadder.com/the-stork-theory-and-knowledge#comment-2252</guid>
		<description>At last somone who is making sense I knew it was storks all the time but no one would believe me. 
I remeber a documentary made by some chap called disney but all my friend said it was a cartoon but I didn&#039;t believe them now my faith has been vindicated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At last somone who is making sense I knew it was storks all the time but no one would believe me.<br />
I remeber a documentary made by some chap called disney but all my friend said it was a cartoon but I didn&#8217;t believe them now my faith has been vindicated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

