<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Opening Arguments Begin (Job 3-5)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anadder.com/the-opening-arguments-begin/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anadder.com/the-opening-arguments-begin</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 06:18:42 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://anadder.com/the-opening-arguments-begin/comment-page-1#comment-22890</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anadder.com/?p=1325#comment-22890</guid>
		<description>Hi Rich, thanks for commenting. Back when I was some non-commital-agnosticky person, I also enjoyed the Book of Job a lot. But it&#039;s interesting that after becoming an atheist it seems a lot more flat and repetitive. Of the &quot;philosophical&quot; works in the Bible I think Ecclesiastes is a lot better since it&#039;s just as relevant to non-believers as it is to believers. Maybe that&#039;s the next book I&#039;ll start on.

Which parts of Genesis are you talking about and what do you get out of them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rich, thanks for commenting. Back when I was some non-commital-agnosticky person, I also enjoyed the Book of Job a lot. But it&#8217;s interesting that after becoming an atheist it seems a lot more flat and repetitive. Of the &#8220;philosophical&#8221; works in the Bible I think Ecclesiastes is a lot better since it&#8217;s just as relevant to non-believers as it is to believers. Maybe that&#8217;s the next book I&#8217;ll start on.</p>
<p>Which parts of Genesis are you talking about and what do you get out of them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://anadder.com/the-opening-arguments-begin/comment-page-1#comment-22816</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anadder.com/?p=1325#comment-22816</guid>
		<description>I hope you don&#039;t mind my commenting.  I stumbled on your site by accident.

You may find me a little different.  I am not sure how many times I have read the book of Job, but it is my favorite in the Hebrew scriptures (what Christians refer to as Old Testament).  I would say Genesis is a very close second.  I tried to read Job 23 years ago, and at that time it was very difficult to me.  Now, I enjoy reading it and dissecting the arguments between Job and his friends.

I hope you enjoy your blogging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you don&#8217;t mind my commenting.  I stumbled on your site by accident.</p>
<p>You may find me a little different.  I am not sure how many times I have read the book of Job, but it is my favorite in the Hebrew scriptures (what Christians refer to as Old Testament).  I would say Genesis is a very close second.  I tried to read Job 23 years ago, and at that time it was very difficult to me.  Now, I enjoy reading it and dissecting the arguments between Job and his friends.</p>
<p>I hope you enjoy your blogging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reading Objectively and Translation Dishonesty (Job 12-17) -- a Nadder!</title>
		<link>http://anadder.com/the-opening-arguments-begin/comment-page-1#comment-13922</link>
		<dc:creator>Reading Objectively and Translation Dishonesty (Job 12-17) -- a Nadder!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anadder.com/?p=1325#comment-13922</guid>
		<description>[...] noticed before how Job often says there&#8217;s no afterlife. So when I read the JPS translation of 14:12 I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] noticed before how Job often says there&#8217;s no afterlife. So when I read the JPS translation of 14:12 I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Job At Warp Speed (Chap 6-7) -- a Nadder!</title>
		<link>http://anadder.com/the-opening-arguments-begin/comment-page-1#comment-12872</link>
		<dc:creator>Job At Warp Speed (Chap 6-7) -- a Nadder!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 02:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anadder.com/?p=1325#comment-12872</guid>
		<description>[...] per my last post on Job, the next bit is a huge stretch of Job going back and forth with his friends. They relay similar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] per my last post on Job, the next bit is a huge stretch of Job going back and forth with his friends. They relay similar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: As Flies To Wanton Boys (Job 1-2) -- a Nadder!</title>
		<link>http://anadder.com/the-opening-arguments-begin/comment-page-1#comment-11821</link>
		<dc:creator>As Flies To Wanton Boys (Job 1-2) -- a Nadder!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anadder.com/?p=1325#comment-11821</guid>
		<description>[...] Actually, the whole setup is precisely treachery and murder. But Why do we see Job as more profound than it is? I think it&#8217;s that the mind naturally associates suffering with the profound. Think of the cliched tortured soul that&#8217;s meant to be a great artist. Think of the counterweight cliche of this artist&#8217;s work becoming worse as he/she becomes happier. And of course it really is easier to write angsty teen poetry that&#8217;s good over happy teen poetry. So it is with Job. I&#8217;m not a fan of Shakespeare: rumours of his profoundness have been greatly exaggerated. But he&#8217;s got the perfect description for this situation: &#8220;As flies to wanton boys, are we to the gods; They kill us for their sport&#8221;. [Continued] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Actually, the whole setup is precisely treachery and murder. But Why do we see Job as more profound than it is? I think it&#8217;s that the mind naturally associates suffering with the profound. Think of the cliched tortured soul that&#8217;s meant to be a great artist. Think of the counterweight cliche of this artist&#8217;s work becoming worse as he/she becomes happier. And of course it really is easier to write angsty teen poetry that&#8217;s good over happy teen poetry. So it is with Job. I&#8217;m not a fan of Shakespeare: rumours of his profoundness have been greatly exaggerated. But he&#8217;s got the perfect description for this situation: &#8220;As flies to wanton boys, are we to the gods; They kill us for their sport&#8221;. [Continued] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
