<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keeping Questionable Company</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anadder.com/keeping-questionable-company/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anadder.com/keeping-questionable-company</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:39:56 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://anadder.com/keeping-questionable-company/comment-page-1#comment-7228</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anadder.com/?p=482#comment-7228</guid>
		<description>Gruebait, as I said it would be simplistic to view signing any one of these as positive without looking at the content and politics of each treaty more closely. My point is that US policy is to be an obstacle to progress in international law, human rights etc. For instance their non-participation in the discrimination against women treaty makes it even easier for, say, Afghanistan to pass their Shia Family Law. If the US was a party it could take Afghanistan to task with a lot of political force behind it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gruebait, as I said it would be simplistic to view signing any one of these as positive without looking at the content and politics of each treaty more closely. My point is that US policy is to be an obstacle to progress in international law, human rights etc. For instance their non-participation in the discrimination against women treaty makes it even easier for, say, Afghanistan to pass their Shia Family Law. If the US was a party it could take Afghanistan to task with a lot of political force behind it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://anadder.com/keeping-questionable-company/comment-page-1#comment-7223</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anadder.com/?p=482#comment-7223</guid>
		<description>Maybe not guilty by association, but guilty of not doing what is right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe not guilty by association, but guilty of not doing what is right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gruebait</title>
		<link>http://anadder.com/keeping-questionable-company/comment-page-1#comment-7218</link>
		<dc:creator>gruebait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anadder.com/?p=482#comment-7218</guid>
		<description>So, All Forms of Discrimination Against Women have been eliminated in Afghanistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, etc.? ...but not in the U.S.? 

I recall a saying, something about being  &quot;worth the paper it&#039;s printed on&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, All Forms of Discrimination Against Women have been eliminated in Afghanistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, etc.? &#8230;but not in the U.S.? </p>
<p>I recall a saying, something about being  &#8220;worth the paper it&#8217;s printed on&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keddaw</title>
		<link>http://anadder.com/keeping-questionable-company/comment-page-1#comment-7021</link>
		<dc:creator>keddaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anadder.com/?p=482#comment-7021</guid>
		<description>We reserve the right to execute children!

Gotta love the good Ol&#039; USA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We reserve the right to execute children!</p>
<p>Gotta love the good Ol&#8217; USA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

