<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Job vs God (Job 38-42)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anadder.com/job-vs-god/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anadder.com/job-vs-god</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 02:41:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://anadder.com/job-vs-god/comment-page-1#comment-31833</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 07:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anadder.com/?p=2331#comment-31833</guid>
		<description>Dan, it&#039;s interesting that the post and comments have specific points which you do not address but rather say that many non-religious people are not interested in debate.

Also you think that THIS of all posts is designed to escalate animosity and humiliate -- really? Where in the post did you get that impression?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, it&#8217;s interesting that the post and comments have specific points which you do not address but rather say that many non-religious people are not interested in debate.</p>
<p>Also you think that THIS of all posts is designed to escalate animosity and humiliate &#8212; really? Where in the post did you get that impression?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takis Konstantopoulos</title>
		<link>http://anadder.com/job-vs-god/comment-page-1#comment-31585</link>
		<dc:creator>Takis Konstantopoulos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anadder.com/?p=2331#comment-31585</guid>
		<description>Dan: There is no such person as &quot;free thinking&quot; and &quot;Christian&quot; (substitute any religion you like). As long as you subscribe to a particular religion, you constrain your thought process because you are being told to believe in dogmas without any proof.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan: There is no such person as &#8220;free thinking&#8221; and &#8220;Christian&#8221; (substitute any religion you like). As long as you subscribe to a particular religion, you constrain your thought process because you are being told to believe in dogmas without any proof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://anadder.com/job-vs-god/comment-page-1#comment-31577</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anadder.com/?p=2331#comment-31577</guid>
		<description>I have found that many non-religious people who offer such arguments are not actually interested in honest debate. They suggest that we free thinking Christians who counter argue for the Bible are &quot;defensive&quot; or &quot;dogmatic&quot;. Which is a pretty effective but dishonest means of debate. And to add a healthy dose of irony, non-Christians get up in arms and calls fowl on Christians when they flatly say &quot;Without divine salvation, you are going to hell.&quot;  My experience tells me the majority of these types of articles are designed for actual discussion or debate, but rather just to escalate animosity and humiliate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have found that many non-religious people who offer such arguments are not actually interested in honest debate. They suggest that we free thinking Christians who counter argue for the Bible are &#8220;defensive&#8221; or &#8220;dogmatic&#8221;. Which is a pretty effective but dishonest means of debate. And to add a healthy dose of irony, non-Christians get up in arms and calls fowl on Christians when they flatly say &#8220;Without divine salvation, you are going to hell.&#8221;  My experience tells me the majority of these types of articles are designed for actual discussion or debate, but rather just to escalate animosity and humiliate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takis Konstantopoulos</title>
		<link>http://anadder.com/job-vs-god/comment-page-1#comment-24220</link>
		<dc:creator>Takis Konstantopoulos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anadder.com/?p=2331#comment-24220</guid>
		<description>Oh, yes, I mean radical disagreement. As soon as you try to talk about the sensitive points of the Bible, (many [most?]) religious people assume a hostile stance and a kind of denialism; they immediately draw a curtain separating them from the other person and will not move an inch from the dogmatic position they have, no matter what evidence you present to them. I think they find themselves being &quot;tried&quot; by &quot;satan&quot; and will defend their faith because they have learned that this is the correct or noble thing to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, yes, I mean radical disagreement. As soon as you try to talk about the sensitive points of the Bible, (many [most?]) religious people assume a hostile stance and a kind of denialism; they immediately draw a curtain separating them from the other person and will not move an inch from the dogmatic position they have, no matter what evidence you present to them. I think they find themselves being &#8220;tried&#8221; by &#8220;satan&#8221; and will defend their faith because they have learned that this is the correct or noble thing to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://anadder.com/job-vs-god/comment-page-1#comment-23992</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anadder.com/?p=2331#comment-23992</guid>
		<description>keddaw: well according to Job there&#039;s no hell or afterlife at all! So I think I&#039;m safe

Takis: I&#039;m not sure that disagreement by itself is an indicator (in genuine fields of enquiry there&#039;s disagreement on all major points). Do you mean major, radical disagreement (as opposed to disagreement on the details within, say, evolutionary biology). In that case I agree</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>keddaw: well according to Job there&#8217;s no hell or afterlife at all! So I think I&#8217;m safe</p>
<p>Takis: I&#8217;m not sure that disagreement by itself is an indicator (in genuine fields of enquiry there&#8217;s disagreement on all major points). Do you mean major, radical disagreement (as opposed to disagreement on the details within, say, evolutionary biology). In that case I agree</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takis Konstantopoulos</title>
		<link>http://anadder.com/job-vs-god/comment-page-1#comment-23913</link>
		<dc:creator>Takis Konstantopoulos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anadder.com/?p=2331#comment-23913</guid>
		<description>I am learning a lot about the Bible (Torah, Old Testament, whatever you want to call it...) from you :-)

You know, every time I try to point out the bad things about it, I get attacked (by the religious ones) as being too arrogant and only looking at the bad things in the Bible. This bemuses me. If the text is supposed to be god-given, why should it be full of controversial points (to say the least)? Is this a joke or what? And then I get attacked again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am learning a lot about the Bible (Torah, Old Testament, whatever you want to call it&#8230;) from you <img src='http://anadder.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>You know, every time I try to point out the bad things about it, I get attacked (by the religious ones) as being too arrogant and only looking at the bad things in the Bible. This bemuses me. If the text is supposed to be god-given, why should it be full of controversial points (to say the least)? Is this a joke or what? And then I get attacked again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keddaw</title>
		<link>http://anadder.com/job-vs-god/comment-page-1#comment-23782</link>
		<dc:creator>keddaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 09:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anadder.com/?p=2331#comment-23782</guid>
		<description>Dude,don&#039;t question it or you&#039;ll go to hell for eternity...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude,don&#8217;t question it or you&#8217;ll go to hell for eternity&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

