<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defending Cynicism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anadder.com/defending-cynicism/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anadder.com/defending-cynicism</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:39:56 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: keddaw</title>
		<link>http://anadder.com/defending-cynicism/comment-page-1#comment-7037</link>
		<dc:creator>keddaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anadder.com/defending-cynicism#comment-7037</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t agree more.

The only problem is that we have replaced our national affections for great leaders for celebrities.  Look at the ridiculous outpouring of grief after Diana died in the UK.  Or the amount of &quot;news&quot; coverage given to stars adopting babies from abroad.

But even there our cynicism appears, &quot;Who&#039;s fabby and who&#039;s flabby?&quot; type articles.  We want to see the worst of people which is a bad thing.

When we hear of a Washington or Downing Street scandal there is no outrage anymore, more a clamour for the sordid details.

Surely the time has come to ask for a higher standard from our elected leaders.  Surely they should be the elite of the population.  (And if they&#039;re going to defend the 10 commandments they should at least be able to name them.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more.</p>
<p>The only problem is that we have replaced our national affections for great leaders for celebrities.  Look at the ridiculous outpouring of grief after Diana died in the UK.  Or the amount of &#8220;news&#8221; coverage given to stars adopting babies from abroad.</p>
<p>But even there our cynicism appears, &#8220;Who&#8217;s fabby and who&#8217;s flabby?&#8221; type articles.  We want to see the worst of people which is a bad thing.</p>
<p>When we hear of a Washington or Downing Street scandal there is no outrage anymore, more a clamour for the sordid details.</p>
<p>Surely the time has come to ask for a higher standard from our elected leaders.  Surely they should be the elite of the population.  (And if they&#8217;re going to defend the 10 commandments they should at least be able to name them.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://anadder.com/defending-cynicism/comment-page-1#comment-2384</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anadder.com/defending-cynicism#comment-2384</guid>
		<description>no, it&#039;s much more of a victorian era uk word.

in fact don&#039;t virtually all curmudgeons hail from that area?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no, it&#8217;s much more of a victorian era uk word.</p>
<p>in fact don&#8217;t virtually all curmudgeons hail from that area?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://anadder.com/defending-cynicism/comment-page-1#comment-2335</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 08:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anadder.com/defending-cynicism#comment-2335</guid>
		<description>Nice use of the word curmudgeonly. We don&#039;t see that nearly enough these days. I&#039;m happy to be a cynical curmudgeon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice use of the word curmudgeonly. We don&#8217;t see that nearly enough these days. I&#8217;m happy to be a cynical curmudgeon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

