Cult of Personality and Religion

One of the most long-standing arguments used by religious debaters (eg. Dinesh D’Souza) is to claim that atheism is responsible for more killings than all the religions put together because of Stalin, Hitler, Mao etc. I have typically seen several types of responses to this:

  1. The killings had nothing to do with the reasoning behind the “state atheism”.
  2. All of these were simply a case of a government imposing irreligion from above, not a true case of the population being atheist.
  3. These regimes were religious. Dawkins does this for the Third Reich and Hitchens’ favourite example is that North Korea is the most religious country on earth because of its extreme cult of personality.

Now, sometimes the responses can be problematic. It’s possible to insist that any regime that commits such horrors must be religious — a No True Atheist fallacy. But D’Souza’s argument still fails. The area I want to go into today is the religious nature of cult of personality.

To me this is such an obvious key in all the dictatorships above that it’s surprising that people can miss it. I’ve blogged before about modern day lunacy that defends a question about Mao’s cult of personality by proclaiming Mao’s greatness. What I didn’t mention in the post is the image that accompanies it. Here it is once more. The Chinese says “Beijing has a Golden Sun”. While it’s usually poor form to substitute pictures for arguments, with cults of personality the pictures really do speak for themselves.

The extent to which political cults use religious imagery is so obvious and astounding that it takes a special kind of thinking to deny it. Another biting example from a recent Time magazine photo-essay on life in North Korea. If I had photoshopped Jesus into the display, would you be able to tell the difference?

But the very worst example I have to share is this poem by Evgeni Yevtushenko’s, published in the 50s about Stalin.

…В бессонной ночной тишине
Он думает о стране, о мире,
Он думает обо мне.
Подходит к окну. Любуясь солнцем,
Тепло улыбается он.
А я засыпаю, и мне приснится
Самый хороший сон.

…Amidst the night’s sleepless quiet
He thinks of the country, of the world.
He thinks of me
Approaches the window. Enthralled by the sun
He smiles warmly.
And I fall asleep and will have
The most wonderful dream.


This is a sublimely, profoundly religious poem. Yevtushenko is in a mystical, spiritual ecstasy that’s indistinguishable from the Personal Relationship with JesusTM or a Sufi mystic’s experience of the divine. The fact that we dislike the object of the poet’s worship a bit more than the historical Jesus (or at least I hope we do!) doesn’t make the poem any less religious.

A friend once told me that when she read 1984, she cried for two weeks because of the last sentence. Well if you can read the aforementioned poem without at least getting a lump in your throat—!

7 comments ↓

#1 Takis Konstantopoulos on 09.05.09 at 11:45 pm

There is no difference between cult of personality and religious faith. I would go further and compare adoration of a footballer, a film star, or a pop singer with religious faith. And I find all of them disgusting. But that’s me. Most people don’t mind singing the same tune as millions of others often without knowing why.

#2 Carnival of the Godless #125 -- a Nadder! on 09.06.09 at 5:33 pm

[...] ← Cult of Personality and Religion [...]

#3 Broadsnark on 09.07.09 at 1:22 am

Funny thing about having been raised jewish, I think it made me even more sensitive to this kind of thing. (No idolatry and all that.) The first time I ever walked into a catholic church it really tripped me out. I think my anti-authoritarianism/anarchism may have sprung up from that as well.

#4 michael on 09.10.09 at 2:09 pm

Takis: I disagree — isn’t it equivocating on the meaning of religiosity? Celebrity “worship” may be vacuous but most of the time it’s not a case of a person deciding the majority of their actions by the celebrity’s example. I don’t think it causes anything like the order of magnitude of harm than following the prescriptive teachings of a set of worship-beliefs.

Broadsnark: I love when a system of belief contains the seeds of its own destruction when someone takes them up! And if you think this freaks you out, check out Takis’s post which has some religious icons of Stalin:
http://randomprocessed.blogspot.com/2008/12/saint-joseph-stalin.html

#5 Takis Konstantopoulos on 09.14.09 at 9:35 am

Michael: Good point. But I can’t stand them (celebrity worshipers) either.

#6 pie on 11.26.09 at 6:58 am

Stalin was at one time in the seminary, studying to be an Orthodox priest, and Hitler was a Catholic. No need to introduce a lack of religion (atheist) as a factor for mass murder. They both were troubled individuals.

#7 michael on 11.26.09 at 11:18 pm

I don’t think Stalin was a theist, youthful seminary or not. But I guess the most important answer is that it’s not the point — the point is the nature of the regime and whether it’s based on superstition (overtly religious or otherwise) or not.

Leave a Comment

Sorry, the spam got too much!
Once you do this, future comments from you won't need this: